The term has generally been regarded as unacceptable in commercial documents and more so in pleadings. Ads Book Preface Paralegals are increasingly called upon to perform substantive legal analysis and legal writing tasks. Lawyers use forms documents when drafting documents such as contracts, wills, and judgments.
To the extent that formality hinders reader comprehension, it is less desirable. The interpretation to be afforded it must in each instance depend upon the circumstances under which it was used. Use conventional punctuation and capitalization in your email messages. We pause to point out that it is impossible to tell whether plaintiff was a participant in the game or was playing in the immediate vicinity.
Avoid this Janus-faced term. Thus it cannot intelligibly be used to fix the occurrence of past events. Westlaw subscriptions will expire on the originally scheduled end date of your online course regardless of course completion status, or the date that you purchased Westlaw.
Petitioners were in effect charged with violating all the provisions of each section of the ordinance or any one provision of each section.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was a stickler for super-tight prose. I am therefore creating this post to document a fairly complete list of authorities that support what I think is the better if not obvious view: It can often be replaced by and or or with no loss in meaning.
In the context of a dispute arising out of a policy of insurance, if the term should create an ambiguity then by the familiar rule of interpretation the ambiguity will be construed most favourably to the insured.
I also welcome comments and criticisms. These same pointers hold true. Shadden v Cowan, Georgia 29, 96 SE 2d at It lends itself, however, as much to ambiguity as to brevity.
The key difference between using phrases or paragraphs from other legal documents, and copying in other contexts or copying the entire document, arises from the fact that lawyers are effectively drawing upon a common pool of clauses that they adjust and modify for their own purposes.
In particular, when legal content must be conveyed to nonlawyers, formality should give way to clear communication. I understand that this online Westlaw access is for use by students currently enrolled in Center for Legal Studies courses and that this access will expire at the end of the time listed below, regardless of my completion status.
And in order to typically has two words too many—to can do the work alone. For example, they might write "u" instead of "you" and "cd" instead of "could. This approach can look wishy-washy.
I understand that the subscription will only be valid during the times outlined below. This is understandable, but it sometimes unfortunately perpetuates an unnecessarily formal legal writing style.
Instead, integrate a few key facts into your issue statement. In the instant case, the petitioners do not allege themselves to be patrons of the Cartersville public school system or taxpayers of the City of Cartersville.
Read the relevant documents and take good notes. Many lawyers use and re-use written documents in this way and call these re-usable documents templates or, less commonly, forms. To the extent that formality produces opacity and imprecision, it is undesirable.
Plagiarism is strictly prohibited in academic work, especially in law review articles, seminar papers, and similar writings intended to reflect the author's original thoughts.
My Westlaw subscription is also limited to 60 hours per month anddownloads within the time that the subscription is valid.
Authority[ edit ] Legal writing places heavy reliance on authority. A Text with Exercises Chicago: Section f 3 of the Internal Revenue Code disallows charitable deductions for grants of partial interests in property such as leases.
And never open with a full-blown statement of facts—despite what you may have learned elsewhere. Law school exams encourage students to use the one-hand-other-hand approach: Klecan v Schmal, NW 2d at Neb When given an assignment, ask plenty of questions.
Live Lecture Course Format:. LEGAL RESEARCH, LEGAL WRITING, AND LEGAL ANALYSIS: PUTTING LAW SCHOOL INTO PRACTICE Other books and articles address those who teach legal research and writing courses.
See e.g. Eric B. Easton et al., ABA, Sec. of Leg. Educ. & Admis. to the B., Sourcebook on Legal Writing. I remain surprised at the number of intelligent, articulate, and well-read legal professionals who still use “and/or” in legal writing.
I am therefore creating this post to document a fairly complete list of authorities that support what I think is the better (if not obvious) view: never use “and/or” in legal writing (or any writing).
Legal Research and Writing for Paralegals has 48 ratings and 1 review. Pam said: A good book for understanding legal researched but lacked on the legal w /5.
Loyola's online library catalog contains records for all of the books in the Law Library and the University Libraries. A few highlighted books are listed below.
To see longer lists of selected books, in three categories - Legal Research and Writing, Paralegal Specific Titles, and Select Legal Topics - scroll over the red Books tab, above, and choose one of the categories that appear below it.
Legal Research, Analysis, and Writing has 30 ratings and 2 reviews. Kienie said: It was easy to read and the index was actually very helpful. Can't say I /5. 10 tips for better legal writing; Bryan Garner on Words. 10 tips for better legal writing.
Don't rely exclusively on computer research. Combine book research with computer research.Legal writing and research books